uTracer-HR 850 V

Con­struc­tion and performance of the popular µTracer vacuum tube analyzer kit. Also covered is the addition of a precision, switching, heater regulator for better accuracy. I call the combo, the µTracer/HR.

uTracer photo
uTracer GUI 344

Part I - Overview, Heater Regulator, Look Inside
Part II - µT in Action, Accuracy, Cost, Docs
Part III - Gallery, Vinyl Wrap, Parts, Building HRB
Part IV - Chassis Assembly, System Test

Ronald Dekker’s µTracer 3+ partial kit at left has been available since 2012 and has since become widely used in the hobbyist community. With some 1400 units shipped, it is, without a doubt, a run-away best seller among kits of this nature. The winning combination of good performance and affordable con­struc­tion makes it quite unusual among available tube testers. This small but powerful tube tester and curve tracer can be purchased as a partial kit for €225 (presently $253) including shipping. You just provide an enclosure, pin switching, a laptop-type AC adapter and a few other parts. Units have been shipped to some 51 countries from the Netherlands. The µTracer makes pulsed mea­sure­ments lasting only ~1ms, whereas conventional analog testers make continuous-time ones. The µTracer also requires a Windows PC (left) which provides the user interface and graphics output.

Although I had already built the Vacuum Tube Analyzer (VTA) covered in another article, I decided to buy a µTracer kit and build this project around it. Why? I want it for plotting tube characteristics automatically. Those can be plotted manually using the VTA but it’s far easier with the µTracer and therefore more likely to happen. I also wanted to have another instrument for comparison with the VTA results.

uTracer-HR with 6L6WXT 500
uT Rear panel 500

µTracer/HR Overview

Seen at left and at the top of the page, four tube sockets support 7-pin mini, 9-pin mini, octal and com­pac­tron tube bases, covering a large swath of receiving types, including the Sovtek 6L6WXT shown. The com­pac­tron socket also serves as an expansion con­nec­tor for accessory boxes to support other bases. Extra room and faint markings on the top panel also make it easy to add up to four more tube sockets, if desired.

The panels are covered with a tough, vinyl car wrap, providing at­trac­tive graph­ics and labeling, as well as an ac­cu­rate, informative template for dril­ling. By the way, the bottom cov­er will be painted “Tektronix blue,” matching the blue lettering.

On the sloping front panel we have a row of 2-pole (DC-type) jacks rep­re­senting tube pins. The red row of banana jacks also connects to those pins, giving convenient access for test equipment. The third row has the voltage sources, labeled in blue, plus a heater voltage selector switch (5.0, 6.3, 12.6V) on the left and a power switch with indicator on the right. Also on that row, labeled in gray to inhibit casual use, is the heater source from the main board, which should be used judiciously. (See below.)

Also on the front panel is the red high voltage warning light and a ground connection for test equip­ment. An array of six, unconnected, 2-pole jacks insures that unused patch cord connectors can always be kept safely with the unit, so they won’t be lost. The rear panel seen in the lower picture has the power cord, computer interface connector and DC fuse. Fusing for the AC line is included in the internal AC adapter. Symbol definitions

Adding a Heater Regulator

Please note that, while I will be direct about discussing limitations of the µTracer, I have great respect for Dekker’s excellent creation. The cost-effectiveness that he has achieved is nothing short of amazing! It has brought a new level of tube testing accuracy to a huge number of hobbyists and I am a very satisfied customer. The tender loving care which went into every aspect of the kit, from the me­tic­u­lous assembly instructions to the carefully bagged and labeled parts is heart-warming. Kudos to Ronald and his wife, Marie-José, for all of their devotion to this labor of love. They continue to provide and support the kits—I periodically receive emails discussing new uses for the µTracer and ways to extend its functions. For example, a recent one discusses small modifications you can make to extend its plate current range to 600mA and more! [Why would you want more than the original 200mA limit? For testing power tubes like the 6550, as discussed here.]

The Issue with the Heater Supply

uTracer heater waveform inv 344There is a discussion in the VTA article which compares it to the µTracer, identifying certain lim­i­ta­tions. I will only mention the main one here: heater voltage accuracy (but I invite you to click the link for more). Dekker has written about the heater voltage issue on his extensive website. The µTracer provides variable heater voltage by generating a 20kHz pulse-width-modulated (PWM) signal of 19V from the main DC supply. These unfiltered pulses are applied to the tube’s heater. The voltage across the heater at left spends most of its time at zero. There is no problem with interference from this because the switching is cleverly stopped during the short mea­sure­ment interval. The problem is simply that the effective heater voltage is affected by the limited time resolution of the PWM and by parasitics which change the waveform. Ferrite beads are needed in the tube socket wiring to avoid VHF tube oscillations but the inductance from the beads can adversely affect the heater waveform and hence, the effective heater voltage. See Appendix A for more on how unfiltered heater pulses affect accuracy.

The issue is complicated by the fact that it’s difficult to measure the effective heater voltage accurately. Only a true RMS (TRMS) measurement can give us the right value. An ordinary, averaging meter will not show the effective heating value of the pulsed waveform. But the dirty little secret of most TRMS meters is that they lose accuracy for signals like this, with high peak-to-average ratios. HP3455A and Tek4050Moreover, accuracy is reduced due to the wide bandwidth of the narrow pulses. With the heater voltage set at 6.3V, my two best TRMS meters (at left, Tektronix 4050 top and HP3455A bottom) showed 6.017 and 5.953Vrms, disagreeing about 1.1%. They agree to 0.2% with a 1kHz sine wave. (Note that the pics were taken later with a sine source to give a representative display.) Averaging the two original values gives 5.985V, which is 5% below the target. One could try to find a setting which will measure 6.3Vrms and use that but with the best available meters disagreeing by over a percent, I wasn’t confident in the measurement.

A Precision, Switching, Heater Supply

Heater Regulator for uTracerThe solution was to build the pre­ci­sion, switching regulator board at right to provide selectable DC heater volt­ages at up to 3A continuously (2A at 12.6V). (Handles higher cur­rents for a limited time.) The three voltages available (5.0, 6.3, 12.6) cover most receiving tubes and any others can be accommodated by using an external lab supply. It uses a switching regulator module available on eBay for just $2 each in a pack of five, including shipping. The rest of the circuitry wraps a precision, remote-sensing regulator (with a 1ppm/C voltage reference) around the module and provides extra LC input and output filtering to suppress switcher noise. The 0.1%, low-tempco divider resistors support a narrow, ±1% adjustment range. That, along with the precision opamp and voltage reference, insures drift is held to just 0.1% or less. It typically holds the output within a couple millivolts, at the socket. The goal was to have it so solid and accurate that there is no need to check it in normal use. See Appendix B for a discussion of the heater regulator design. Full documentation and a source for the PCB are at the end of Part II.

Inside the µTracer/HR

Inside uTracerHR 850

Above, all of the electronics are mounted to the top section of the chassis. The bottom cover is just a cover. In this view, the µTracer main board sits above the tube sockets on 1.5 inch standoffs. At left we see the rear panel items, including the DC terminal strip with the inductor and the AC terminal strip below with the mains connections. (There will be a clear plastic shield above the AC connections but I still need to locate a thin, clear, plastic, L-shaped piece for that.) The 65W AC adapter is mounted at the corner of the rear and top panels using contact cement. This gives it maximal thermal contact with the aluminum panels for heat dissipation. Contact cement is expected to provide a robust mount (it’s used to attach laminates to countertops) but since it stays pliable, the AC adapter can be pried loose if it fails.

To the right, the switching heater power supply is mounted to the back of the front panel where there is plenty of aluminum area to help dissipate heat. With the red switching regulator module being a second level above the PCB and the front panel sloping down close to the bottom cover, I had to be careful to insure there is adequate clearance.

Below, the main board is flipped-up into service position, revealing the socket field wiring, loaded with oscillation-suppressing beads. A key design goal is to make all parts of the unit easily serviceable. To support that, all wires going to the PCB must attach from one side. The heater regulator board can flip up like this too.

uT main board in service position 850

Below is a close-up view of the socket field wiring, with all the ferrite beads. Most wires going to a tube pin must have a bead. The exceptions are short wires linking the left two sockets and separately, wires linking the right two sockets. Following Dekker’s suggestions, pin-1 (for example) is routed from the connector to one end of the socket field (through a bead) and looped through the sockets (placing a bead in the middle) and then returned to the connector, through a bead. A separate sense-wire runs from the second connector pole to the reference socket (usually the octal), through a bead.

uT socket field wiring 850


Coming up next: µTracer in action, accuracy tests, cost and documentation...

Copyright © 2019, Stephen H. Lafferty


Reader Comments

Posted by Steve L. July 08, 2019 - 01:50 pm
Hi Brice, Thank you for posting the kind follow-up. I'm very pleased that we were able to clear up the problem. All the best.

Posted by Brice July 08, 2019 - 01:32 pm
Hi Steve.

Thank you very much for your insight and for taking the time to investigate this matter.

Yes the MaxiPreamp does not give current readings like the Amplitrex so we don't know in what condition the tube is tested at.

I've done your test and indeed, having the Vg around 1V gives you more accurate results.
In this case, there is nothing wrong with the Utracer design, but rather with my interpretation of the results.

I am going to play with the MaxiPreamp and try to find the operating point but I suspect it is adjusted for each measure while ours is static.

I agree with the PS supply upgrade. I just didn't know it would impact small signal tubes too, with such small heater current demand.

Thank you again Steve.

Posted by Steve L. July 07, 2019 - 09:26 am
Hi Brice, I have read your thread in the Google Groups uTracer forum, titled "Low GM test results," under the handle, "BHdeC" and can see that this issue has troubled you for some time. Sorry for your frustration but I think we can soon get to the bottom of it. Please refer to the chart seen here: http://www.tronola.com/misc/ECC83_Gm_chart.png (You might want to right-click the link and open it in a new window.) The line labeled "S" is Gm and the scale on the right is in thousands of micromhos. For example, at 1mA, it has about 1550umho. Notice that at 0.3mA, it has only about 800umho. So operating current is a critical parameter in tube testing. By changing the current, you can get vastly different results.

The MaxiPreamp tester manual does not make clear what the conditions of the Gm test are but as mentioned before, they may be much higher than the 0.3mA you mentioned. The other tester mentioned in the thread was Sencore MU-150. I will say that it seems to be a cut above some others from the old days but still the supplies are for the most part, unregulated and control over operating conditions is limited. It attempts to hold operating current to a fixed value of 2, 7 or 25mA. At the lowest of those, the ECC83 chart shows Gm at about 2130umho, so that may explain the lower readings you are seeing with the uTracer.

Right now, I'm plugging-in a JJ ECC83 into the uTracer and running a quick test. Using a chart of plate curves, I see that, at Va=200V, I need to set Vg= -1.1V to get about 2mA to match the Sencore. Running the quick test gives Gm=2480umhos, which exceeds the Sencore reading. On the VTA, with the same voltage settings, I get Gm=2270, so the uTracer reads about 9% higher in this case. Also for those settings, the uTracer gives 2.08mA and the VTA gives 2.09mA. In case you're wondering, the VTA shows that Vg= -1.16 gives Ia=2mA for this tube and Gm=2217 there.

I think you can see that the discrepancies you are seeing can be explained by the different test currents and different tester methodologies. By the way, the heater supply issue in the uTracer is a real and known problem, not just for power tubes. It's essential to power the heater from an external supply, as shown in the article. I will be happy to help if you have further questions. Thank you for diligently pursuing this issue. Doing this kind of crossing-checking and investigation helps everyone understand their instruments and how to use them to best advantage.

Posted by Brice July 06, 2019 - 10:16 pm
Thanks Steve.
I've posted my findings to the Utracer Google group forum. Ron is aware and looking into to.
But definitely, the lowest the measured current is the worse the precision is, to not relevant anymore. Cheers.

Posted by Steve L. July 03, 2019 - 08:34 am
Hi Brice, Thank you for the kind comments. It's true that the accuracy of the µTracer may be reduced for some low-bias tubes but for the 12AX7 running at the databook condition of 0.5mA, we found that the gm reading was within 2.4% of our own VTA. The Rp reading was 3.6% off in the other direction, so mu was only about 1.2% off relative to the VTA. Regarding the MaxiPreamp tester, I notice that it seems to operate the tube in a peculiar set of conditions and it's unclear whether it is measuring true gm and mu.

For example, the manual conflates the terms, gain and mu, then shows a chart which appears to list values of external Rp used in the gain test. The problem is, mu is supposed to be the voltage gain for an infinite external plate resistor. For the gm measurement, it's not clear what the conditions are and to be able to compare the reading to the µTracer, one would need to know them. Are they the same as the Gain measurement chart? If so, one can only choose 1, 2 or 4mA, so the gm measured would be very different from that seen by the µTracer, operating at the value you mentioned of 0.3mA.

Too often, we speak of a tube's gm as if it's a constant, when in fact, it's strongly dependent on operating conditions. Whenever I speak of a tube's "ideal gm," it's based on the specific conditions given in standard databooks. I really appreciate your bringing up this interesting topic because it seems we are only starting to emerge from the dark days of tube testers of yore which purported to test gm but didn't operate tubes at standard conditions.

Posted by Brice June 30, 2019 - 06:32 pm
Very nice article. Excellent source of information.

I've build one on these UTracer and I am very please with it.
It works great for most tubes with decent emission.

However, for low current tube, typically 12ax7 with a static emission lower than 0.3mA, the gm and mu values are totally off, compared with a MaxiPreamp tester.

This is a problem for me.

Posted by Steve L. June 14, 2019 - 05:37 am
Hi Josh, Your implementation of the µTracer looks really nice! Thanks for the link and tips for using the Bluetooth and USB modules.

Posted by Josh June 14, 2019 - 05:27 am
Hi Steve, I like your tube tester! One thing I would consider is using USB and Bluetooth instead of the serial port connector. I have my uTracer working with both.

You can see my tips here: https://www.dos4ever.com/uTracer3/uTracer3_pag9.html

Search for “2018 Josh” and the notes with photos of my build will pop up. You’ll see I also designed a regulated power supply so I can use it with an IEC socket.

Posted by Sven June 06, 2019 - 06:01 am
Well, I have the M107 too but use it rarely. For tubes there is not enough current capability. As heater supply for the uTracer I use the model PL550-1 Trygon. Max current is 1 A not sufficient for big tubes. There I have other power supplies when necessary.

Posted by Steve L. June 05, 2019 - 06:47 am
Hi Sven, That seems like a great way to power heaters for the µTracer. Doing a quick search for Systron Donner precision lab supplies turned-up the M107 here, so I see that they made some very impressive supplies! Thank you for your kind comments.

1 - 2 - next> - last>>

Add your comments here...




™ Please note that “µTracer” is Ronald Dekker’s trademark and there is no commercial use intended in this educational article. We are grateful to him for allowing us to use it here.