Comments for page: MXR Preamp

<<first - <previous - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - next> - last>>

Posted by Steve L. June 15, 2014 - 12:37 pm
Hi Jim, Thank you for posting about your model 150. It's good to hear that all works well after all these years. Sorry that I don't have a clue about pricing for these, as they so rarely appear. I wish you well in finding a buyer. I'm sure that it will make someone happy.

Posted by Jim R June 15, 2014 - 12:12 pm
Bought my model 150 new in the early 80s, using all the features (equalizer, tape loops, etc.) for many years. Just recently hooked it back up and was happy to find everything works. This is all a prelude to selling the unit. Any ideas about pricing? Anyone out there interested ? If so, leave a comment with an email addr. and I'll get back.

Posted by Steve L. January 27, 2013 - 08:07 am
Hi Don, (Why did you have to wait for yours to be available? What did you use the mixing feature for?) I bought my Model 150 new, circa 1981. The mixing feature was important to me also, because I had a vision of having two turntables and recording realtime collections of tracks...

Posted by Don January 26, 2013 - 10:08 pm
Hello Steve et al
I bought the MXR System Preamp II to replace a dying Phase Linear 4000. The PL 4000 could fade from one input to another, so the MXR was the logic (and only) replacement I found. I had to wait for it to be available, and it was worth the wait. I use the MXR pretty much daily, works great even after all these years. It's the best piece of hi-fi I ever had.

Posted by Steve L. January 24, 2013 - 11:16 pm
Hi Don, Thanks so much for your message. Can you share with us, how you came to own the MXR? Which model?

Posted by Don January 24, 2013 - 10:52 pm
way cool to hear others appreciating this fine preamp. My M-150 needs it's switches cleaned, but other than that it has preformed to my every expectation. I love it, don't know what could replace it. I haven't seen anything comparable. Don

<<first - <previous - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - next> - last>>